#

CBI Under Fire for Using Gagging Clauses Amid Sexual Misconduct Claims

The president of the CBI has admitted he does not know if it can win back trust while setting out how it plans to bolster its culture amid the sexual misconduct scandal engulfing the business lobby group.

The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has come under scrutiny after it was revealed that the organization has employed gagging clauses to silence staff from discussing their encounters with sexual misconduct and bullying within the institution.

According to sources, up to 10 non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) have been signed by individuals in the past year following a scandal within the CBI, where more than a dozen staff members alleged incidents of sexual harassment, assault, and rape. These agreements, accompanied by significant financial settlements from the CBI, have raised concerns about the organization’s commitment to fostering a culture of transparency and accountability.

It is estimated that the total cost of these agreements, including legal fees, settlement deals, and pension agreements, could be as high as £1 million. However, the CBI has refused to confirm or deny this figure.

The use of NDAs in cases of workplace misconduct has been increasingly controversial, with critics arguing that they often silence victims and protect perpetrators. MPs on the Treasury committee investigating Sexism in the City have called for a ban on the use of NDAs in such cases, citing their detrimental effects on victims.

In response to the revelations, CBI’s chief executive, Rain Newton-Smith, defended the use of NDAs, stating that they do not prevent individuals from raising issues with the police. However, concerns remain about the impact of these agreements on the organization’s efforts to overhaul its culture and address misconduct.

The use of NDAs by the CBI has raised questions about its commitment to transparency and accountability, particularly in light of its ongoing reform efforts and attempts to regain trust and credibility.

Critics argue that NDAs can prevent victims from speaking out and sharing their experiences with others, thereby hindering efforts to identify patterns of problematic behavior and hold perpetrators accountable. The use of NDAs in cases of sexual harassment or assault has been criticized for its chilling effect and potential to perpetuate a culture of secrecy and impunity.

Despite the controversy surrounding the use of NDAs, Newton-Smith stated that the CBI would continue to use them but would keep their use under review and reflect “best practice.” However, concerns persist about the impact of these agreements on the organization’s culture and its ability to address misconduct effectively.

Read more:
CBI Under Fire for Using Gagging Clauses Amid Sexual Misconduct Claims